From: "John McCarthy" <vpocv@hotmail.com>
Subject: 9.11 and The War In Iraq
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:59:19 +0000

Greetings, Scott

Reasonable men and women, when confronted with the available evidence, would surely come to the conclusion that 9.11 was an Inside job.

The evidence is overwhelming.

Therefore, without another thread, these same reasonable men and women will have to deal with a charge of mass murder against those who planned and facillitated the act.

We also know that the Patriot Act (damn near identical to the Enabling Act of 1933 after the Reichstag Fire) must be null and void as it was supposedly created as a direct result 45 days after 9.11, hardly enough time for those folks in DC to scratch their collective asses.

Therefore, the preemptive attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq under the guise of"al Quaida" being responsible for 9.11 is moot and therefore constitutes the ultimate war crime; crimes against humanity and crimes against peace via the Nuremberg Findings which we established in 1945.

There is NO CAUSAL relationship or an excuse between 9.11 and these War Crimes.

The "evidence" and so called "slam dunk" posturing of the Intelligence Committee before the Congress and the United Nations is exposed for the charade it is. WMD in Iraq was and is a myth of egregious proportions. The erroneous assertions by the Intelligence Community is treasonous. The Downing Street Memo's seal the deal.

Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson was appointed by President Truman in 1945 to be the Chief Prosecutor at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nuremberg, Germany and his opening remarks to the jury were: "The standards by which we judge these men today are the standards by which we shall be judged tomorrow."

Then we hanged them.

Bests,
John McCarthy
http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com